{"id":158,"date":"2016-05-31T11:45:33","date_gmt":"2016-05-31T18:45:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/2016\/05\/31\/revenge-of-the-sequel-by-keefer-c-blakeslee\/"},"modified":"2016-05-31T11:45:33","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T18:45:33","slug":"revenge-of-the-sequel-by-keefer-c-blakeslee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/2016\/revenge-of-the-sequel-by-keefer-c-blakeslee\/","title":{"rendered":"Revenge of the Sequel by Keefer C. Blakeslee"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a onfocus=\"this.blur()\" onclick=\"ps_imagemanager_popup(this.href,'sequelprequel.jpg','321','157');return false\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sequelprequel.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"191\" vspace=\"3\" hspace=\"6\" height=\"93\" border=\"0\" align=\"left\" title=\"sequelprequel.jpg\" alt=\"sequelprequel.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/.thumbs\/.sequelprequel.jpg\" \/><\/a>A sequel blog to a remake blog? It sounds like a paradox. For those of you who don\u2019t remember, my last blog discussed remakes and looked at them from a more positive point of view. I thought it would be fitting to talk about another one of Hollywood\u2019s quick cash schemes &#8211; the sequels and prequels. You all know them, the continuation or back story to a film that has already been made. Now, I don\u2019t particularly dislike sequels as much as remakes. There are some cases of necessary extension of a film\u2019s story. <em>Indiana Jones <\/em>(not including <em>Crystal Skull<\/em>) still kept its charm with each new installment. Each Back to the Future film had enough comedy and adventure to make audiences come back to the theater. Finally, who can forget the <em>Toy Story<\/em> trilogy. This group of films got better and better as time went on.<\/p>\n<p>I have to say that I am a sucker for prequels. I love the idea of taking a film\u2019s story or character and pushing rewind to see how it all started. <em>Red Dragon<\/em> managed to give an equally thrilling experience from its predecessor <em>Silence of the Lambs. <\/em>Audiences saw how Hannibal Lecture was captured and the relationship between him and the man who caught him. One of my favorite prequels is <em>X-Men: First Class<\/em>. Not only is this film strong enough to be its own film but we\u2019re also exposed to Professor X and Magneto\u2019s original friendship, turned rivalry. That\u2019s what makes a good sequel and prequel. Being able to regain the same essence that made people love the original or, better yet, add something new that makes people love the story even more.<\/p>\n<p><a onfocus=\"this.blur()\" onclick=\"ps_imagemanager_popup(this.href,'Keefer.2014.5.jpg','427','640');return false\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Keefer.2014.5.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"167\" vspace=\"3\" hspace=\"6\" height=\"250\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\" alt=\"Keefer.2014.5.jpg\" title=\"Keefer.2014.5.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/.thumbs\/.Keefer.2014.5.jpg\" \/><\/a>All of these are examples of films with good sequels or prequels. Where are the bad eggs and what makes them rotten? Most prequels and sequels that get negative responses happen because they\u2019re unnecessary. Do we really need four <em>Alvin<br \/>\nand the Chipmunks<\/em> films? One was enough. Back to the Hannibal Lecture trend, Hannibal Rising is a non-essential prequel that killed the mystery of one of cinema\u2019s most terrifying characters. Audiences don\u2019t ask for films such as this and yet, studios keep pushing them out. Films like these make moviegoers and film buffs continue to believe that Hollywood is running out of ideas.<\/p>\n<p>While we can point the finger at studio executives, we need to understand that certain audiences contribute to the sequel and prequel madness. They say, \u201cI loved <em>Frozen<\/em> and \u2018Let it Go.\u2019 I want more Elsa.\u201d\u00a0 \u201cWow, how did Anakin Skywalker turn to the dark side?\u201d A lot of the time audiences want to see and ask for more. I\u2019m not saying we are to blame but we are not completely innocent. When producers or studio board members get a pulse that they\u2019re making a lot of money from a film, they want to see how long they can drag it out. Example, \u201cWe made a lot of money with <em>Lord of the Rings<\/em>, let\u2019s see if we can take <em>The Hobbit<\/em> and make it into three films and make more money.\u201d I understand that\u2019s a cynical way of looking at it and I\u2019m sure filmmakers are not purposefully trying to make poor sequels and prequels but when they seemed forced and redundant they come across that way.<\/p>\n<p>Should we stop asking for more? Of course not. There are films that many people want to see continued. I\u2019ve personally been waiting for another <em>Incredibles<\/em> film or maybe see the back story for <em>The Matrix<\/em>. Sequels and prequels aren\u2019t all bad. They just need to be created naturally instead of forced.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A sequel blog to a remake blog? It sounds like a paradox. For those of you who don\u2019t remember, my last blog discussed remakes and looked at them from a more positive point of view. I thought it would be fitting to talk about another one of Hollywood\u2019s quick cash schemes &#8211; the sequels and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-film-critics-blog"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kidsfirst.org\/juror\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}